3rd
Socially Clueless
I moved to Anchorage six months ago, after living 20 years in Fairbanks. The move has been invigorating and refreshing, but of course there are folks I miss. Still, Alaskans pass through Anchorage all the time. I knew I’d see my friends, and I have.Yesterday I was lucky enough to see two of them, if only briefly. The first is one of my favorite people. We shopped and shared a salad and talked about family, friends, life, and plans. She’s a person I always feel privileged to be with - gracious, kind, intelligent. She’s the kind of person who leaves you feeling enriched and loved.
The second - well, let’s say it was a contrast. It was the first time I’d seen her since the Big Move. I showed her where I lived, asked about her life, asked about her plans, asked about mutual friends. I asked till I couldn’t think of what to ask anymore. An hour passed, and I was feeling tired. I’m not good at monologue. Not once did she ask about me, what I’d been doing, my life here. Not once was there a point of real connection.
Now, what if I told you one of these was a man?
Not all social graces are gender-specific, but some are. And circumstances play a big part in how we interact with others. My second friend may have been distracted, not really in the moment. But even as I tried to excuse the behavior, it left me feeling empty, and wondering about what makes for good social interaction, and whether it matters.
Let me be clear. I’m naturally bad at small talk, and I spent a good part of my life being painfully shy. But I made an effort, and I’d like to think I’ve made some progress with both. I think that’s important. Recently I read an article about one of those studies that points out the obvious. Social skills set humans apart from other creatures. Moreover, societies in which the group matters more than the individual are more successful.
That bodes ill for Americans, and perhaps for Alaskans in particular - the independent spirit and all that jazz. But I don’t think Alaska’s just for loners and the socially inept. When I first came here in the late 70’s to teach in several Yup’ik villages, I found a closer sense of community than I’ve ever found elsewhere. Gussak teachers were the minority. Villagers were gracious but distant. They’d seen enough of us come and go. We were the outsiders. So we clung together, forming deep and lasting relationships with people who weren’t all that much like us. The situation threw us together. We bonded, and we were better people for it.
I suppose a certain percentage of people have always been socially clueless, which is mostly another way of saying they’re “all about me.” I had a great discussion last weekend with a friend who’s a retired State Trooper. We were watching 48 hours, a story about a wife who’d maybe murdered her husband. What about these criminals, I asked. The ones who seem so normal, whose friends talk about how nice they are, the PTA moms who bake cookies and host cookouts and get arrested for murder. Guilty, he said. Listen to her. It’s all about her. Me, me, me.
Okay, maybe that’s more than just socially clueless. But why do some people get it and some people don’t? It’s like some people’s rear view mirrors reflect only back on themselves.
The rules of engagement are slipping away. No one disputes that. In their place, we have electronic interaction. Social networking. Blogs. Millions of forums, countless opportunities to interact. I’d like to think that some - this blog included, of course - promote positive interaction. But the medium is the messasge, as McLuhan tried to warn us so many years ago. Now we have distance and the delete key, and no obligation to respond if we don’t feel like it.
Ah, the irony. Look at the forum for this rant.
I’d like to hear what you have to say. Really.